Cranberry grower pesticides problem for Wareham drinking water supply

Mar 26, 2018

To the Editor:

The Wareham Fire District’s rate increase will be economically challenging for many residents. Unfortunately, however, the cranberry bog pesticides in our drinking water wells could prove a much bigger problem, unless the primary source of these chemicals demonstrates more civic responsibility and the district insists upon more accountability from this pesticide source.

Some of the cranberry pesticides in our drinking water are banned in dozens of countries. In fact, there is a cocktail of pesticides in our wells which the European Union has ruled are too dangerous, at any level, for human consumption, sale or use due to their toxicity and persistence in water.

According to the exhaustive study conducted by the expert Kleinfelder firm, the primary source of the pesticides is clear: migration from the Maple Springs cranberry bogs owned and operated by the AD Makepeace Company. And this study sadly reports that the contamination is expected to continue to impact the wells at existing or potentially higher concentrations for years to come.

In its defense, Makepeace boasts that: “Respect for the environment guides everything we do.”

But, freedom of information disclosures from the Wareham Fire District report that, after having been provided monitoring data summarizing the “cranberry chemicals” in our drinking wells, Makepeace proposed to sell water to the district from wells it operates elsewhere. Was this offer guided by respect for the environment, or a self-serving effort to turn its contamination problem into profits?

The freedom of information disclosures also make clear that despite failing to respond to the district’s then latest requests that it share in the cost of the well cleanup, Makepeace was nevertheless provided a courtesy “final draft” of the district’s citizen informational flyer about the cranberry pesticide problem. Thereafter, Makepeace threatened legal action against the district and set out to remove, not its pesticides, but key provisions of the flyer describing the risks of the pesticides. Were these Makepeace tactics also guided by its respect for the environment?

Make no mistake, the district having allowed Makepeace to have any influence whatsoever over the information provided to consumers about the risks of its cranberry pollutants (and erasing all references to cranberry bogs in the citizen flyer) suggests more concern with Makepeace’s threats than with the district’s published pledges that the quality of our wells is its “top priority.”

But, then again, why not? After all, the Town of Wareham is a virtual printing press of development approvals and tax breaks for Makepeace, in complete indifference to its bogs having been scientifically identified as the primary source of the pesticides in our drinking water supply.

So, while our new water rates are high … these fees are not nearly as unfair as the primary source of the pesticides, Makepeace, failing to pay its fair share for monitoring and fixing the pesticide contamination it helped cause.

“Our 160-year history in the cranberry industry affects the way we do business” says Makepeace. Don’t we know it!

Barry Cosgrove

Comments (9)
Posted by: Wareham By The Sea | Mar 27, 2018 10:20

This appears to be somewhat unprecedented.  Does the big news know?  Does the EPA know?  Is it really that bad?  Is there proof of health issues?  Are we the next Civil Action movie in Wareham instead of Woburn with Makepeace instead of Riley Tannery?



Posted by: cranky pants | Mar 27, 2018 12:47

Makepeace has always held " diplomatic immunity " in this town. Anyone who's been around long enough know the bullsh!t the BOS put Brock through, yet watched wetlands be filled and dirt was being trucked from tihonet yet nobody batted an eyelash. It's ok to convert agricultural land to residential I guess.



Posted by: Rosebud | Mar 27, 2018 13:16

This warrants investigation for sure.  I don't want to live like those poor people in Flint, Michigan.



Posted by: desertsky | Mar 27, 2018 15:28

Where's Tom Girardi when you need him?!



Posted by: thkng60@yahoo.com | Mar 28, 2018 06:10

WHY ISN'T MAKEPEACE PAYING FOR THE NEW WATER PLANT INSTEAD OF THE TAXPAYERS??  SHOULD BE, YOU BROKE IT, SO YOU  FIX IT.



Posted by: WWreader | Mar 28, 2018 07:48

Sounds like this guy has an axe to grind with Makepeace. But don’t believe everything you read. Get the facts before calling for action. There’s always two sides to every story.



Posted by: Spherebreaker | Mar 28, 2018 11:31

Lets hear and see the proof from the other side about how those chemicals are not theirs. Warehams exhaustive study done by Klienfelder says that they are Makepeaces chemicals polluting our wells. We are all waiting..............................................................



Posted by: WWreader | Mar 28, 2018 20:50

Take a look at the latest drinking water report on the Water District site. Check the section on agricultural chemicals. I'm not worried about drinking town water.

http://www.warehamfiredistrict.org/images/Wareham_Fire_District_CCR_for_2017.pdf



Posted by: lsblack | Mar 29, 2018 06:02

I stay away from glyphosate as much as possible. Is that in our ground water now?



If you wish to comment, please login.